Set up
Name is important
Security decisions
Student sign up
Does the project have meaning to the kids
Security
Completely open
You and your students can edit
Only you and your students
Only you
Go to History Page Revert
Student Sign Up
completely open
have your studentsw login and apply to become a member to your wiki
you can sign up your students
students sign up for your wiki and get their own account
Framework rules for contributions
student must sign up to get credit for homework assignments
first homework assignment credit is sign up
\login name should be recognizable to the group
all contributions should be signed
facilitator options
teacher sets topics and edits contributions
teacher sets topics, student contribute and teacher final edit
teacher sets topics - students control everything after
students setps topics - students control everythig after
students have own wiki - teacher observer
Model for students developing review Guide Content
teacher defines content
student contribute
students collaborate to determine most important helpful content
Teacher advises during process
Student determine the final product based on needs
Types of Content and Resources
text erelated
diagrams and pics
links to relevant websites
embedded web 2.0
audio and video
Assessing Student Contributions
directly on the wiki
go to history to quantify contributions
view quality of editing from History page
From cooperation to Collaboration
Students in Small Groups edit the submissions
Small groups present their new/improved version
all small groups discuss new versions and agree upon final version
Why the process is important
shy/quiet students can contribute equally
there is subtle pressure to do better work
A higher level of discourse is modeled for all
students are to reflect on their learning
The product should be relevant/important to all
To Clear or Not to Clear every Year
On this type of project - where students are building their own web content
do you start over from scratch every year?
do students build on previous years work?
Name is important
Security decisions
Student sign up
Does the project have meaning to the kids
Security
Completely open
You and your students can edit
Only you and your students
Only you
Go to History Page Revert
Student Sign Up
completely open
have your studentsw login and apply to become a member to your wiki
you can sign up your students
students sign up for your wiki and get their own account
Framework rules for contributions
student must sign up to get credit for homework assignments
first homework assignment credit is sign up
\login name should be recognizable to the group
all contributions should be signed
facilitator options
teacher sets topics and edits contributions
teacher sets topics, student contribute and teacher final edit
teacher sets topics - students control everything after
students setps topics - students control everythig after
students have own wiki - teacher observer
Model for students developing review Guide Content
teacher defines content
student contribute
students collaborate to determine most important helpful content
Teacher advises during process
Student determine the final product based on needs
Types of Content and Resources
text erelated
diagrams and pics
links to relevant websites
embedded web 2.0
audio and video
Assessing Student Contributions
directly on the wiki
go to history to quantify contributions
view quality of editing from History page
From cooperation to Collaboration
Students in Small Groups edit the submissions
Small groups present their new/improved version
all small groups discuss new versions and agree upon final version
Why the process is important
shy/quiet students can contribute equally
there is subtle pressure to do better work
A higher level of discourse is modeled for all
students are to reflect on their learning
The product should be relevant/important to all
To Clear or Not to Clear every Year
On this type of project - where students are building their own web content
do you start over from scratch every year?
do students build on previous years work?